http://vixra.org/pdf/1906.0146v2.pdf
I am inventing the field of gyrochronology so that it applies to all stars in all stages of evolution, not just the ones that have the masses of Sun-like stars.
Venus, Mercury, Earth, Uranus, Saturn... the thousands of evolving stars found by Kepler (which are called exoplanets by the dogma). They all have a spot in the grand evolutionary history of our galaxy.
They all spin, and so much more information can be gathered from their spin rate than what the dogma allows for. It is time to open the flood gates.
Friday, June 21, 2019
Wednesday, June 5, 2019
Monday, June 3, 2019
June is PTSD Awareness Month
Grab a cat or a kitten, dog or puppy and play with it. Let the scenes of death, chaos and extreme paranoia have its sharp edges removed. If you can.
If not do what I do. Take those scenes and form them into emotions so that they can be placed in a new room in your mind. Make room for death in your mind, don't push it away, that takes too much effort. Death can have his own room, like a new member of the family, he gets his own bed too. Let him grow up and age with all the other nasty ideas, but don't let them be the head of household.
Think of your mind as a constantly expanding mansion, with new rooms being added. It is okay to expand who you are in the same way, that chaos is necessary energy to build and renovate. Sublimate it into useful work.
If you are arguing with a loved one, just stop, do some pushups. Exercise yourself while your mind sorts and builds something new inside of you.
Life is nasty and brutal sometimes, it is best to let the nasty and brutal emotions handle them, but don't let them take charge.
Life sometimes doesn't make any sense either, let confusion handle those times. It is okay to be lost. Sometimes you need a whole lot of mixed emotions to handle life, don't just push them down thinking they are unwanted/unneeded. They are there to guide you, regardless if they are constantly nagging you the whole way there.
If not do what I do. Take those scenes and form them into emotions so that they can be placed in a new room in your mind. Make room for death in your mind, don't push it away, that takes too much effort. Death can have his own room, like a new member of the family, he gets his own bed too. Let him grow up and age with all the other nasty ideas, but don't let them be the head of household.
Think of your mind as a constantly expanding mansion, with new rooms being added. It is okay to expand who you are in the same way, that chaos is necessary energy to build and renovate. Sublimate it into useful work.
If you are arguing with a loved one, just stop, do some pushups. Exercise yourself while your mind sorts and builds something new inside of you.
Life is nasty and brutal sometimes, it is best to let the nasty and brutal emotions handle them, but don't let them take charge.
Life sometimes doesn't make any sense either, let confusion handle those times. It is okay to be lost. Sometimes you need a whole lot of mixed emotions to handle life, don't just push them down thinking they are unwanted/unneeded. They are there to guide you, regardless if they are constantly nagging you the whole way there.
Friday, May 24, 2019
Uranus and Neptune's Age
http://vixra.org/pdf/1905.0411v1.pdf
Now it is time to go full blast. I'm getting the hang of what this data means,... I think...
yea dude. Plus there is a specific pattern I'm finding. The D/H ratios are highest for top material (closer to Venus's ratio), and go lower the deeper into the star you go (closer to the Sun's ratios).
This is important because it infers the material that formed the earliest in the star's evolution will have combined into more complex molecules such as acetylene, C2H2, and methane, CH4.
In other words, the ratio's should appear older near the top of the star, and younger as you go deeper, the reverse of the geological principle of superposition. This is because of the process of differentiation, the youngest most pristine material will deposit internally as it forms more complex molecules out of D and H (acetylene/methane), and work its way outward as it is deposited.
link
Sure its an old paper, but it is good that I can cross over the absolute age in a reverse manner, as opposed to the relative age as offered by the principle of superposition (geological principle). [en.wikipedia.org]
Now it is time to go full blast. I'm getting the hang of what this data means,... I think...
yea dude. Plus there is a specific pattern I'm finding. The D/H ratios are highest for top material (closer to Venus's ratio), and go lower the deeper into the star you go (closer to the Sun's ratios).
This is important because it infers the material that formed the earliest in the star's evolution will have combined into more complex molecules such as acetylene, C2H2, and methane, CH4.
In other words, the ratio's should appear older near the top of the star, and younger as you go deeper, the reverse of the geological principle of superposition. This is because of the process of differentiation, the youngest most pristine material will deposit internally as it forms more complex molecules out of D and H (acetylene/methane), and work its way outward as it is deposited.
link
Sure its an old paper, but it is good that I can cross over the absolute age in a reverse manner, as opposed to the relative age as offered by the principle of superposition (geological principle). [en.wikipedia.org]
Monday, May 20, 2019
Jupiter...I found its age, oh and Mars too...
Its all on post it notes right now, but holy moly. That D/H data is pure fire.
534-980 my
I have to write a paper on it. I still can't believe it.
Mars paper here:
http://vixra.org/pdf/1905.0369v1.pdf
534-980 my
I have to write a paper on it. I still can't believe it.
Mars paper here:
http://vixra.org/pdf/1905.0369v1.pdf
Monday, May 13, 2019
Do Astronomers Know What Assumptions Are?
An assumption is something that is accepted as true without proof.
Article here: https://phys.org/news/2017-10-scientists-assumptions-planet-formation.html
They accept the assumption that planets are remnants of star-formation. There is no proof that planets are remnants of star-formation. So, I find it strange that the headline to the article states,
"Senior Lecturer in Astronomy at the School of Physical Sciences, Dr. Helen Fraser, says, "We are already aware of thousands of planets orbiting stars in our own galaxy, as remnants of star-formation, and yet there still isn't a model anywhere in science that can explain exactly how planets form. Our basic understanding is that small particles stick together, building bigger particles, which then also stick, and so forth, until eventually, we have a planet."
The assumption they refuse to question is, "are planets remnants of star-formation"? The answer is NO!
Planets are stellar remnants! They are the remnants of stellar evolution, in effect, they are the highly evolved stars!
All the evidence (future, past and current) points to stars in all stages of evolution into life hosting planets, which eventually die and wander the galaxy. Calling the evolving stars, "planets" is where they are wrong. So totally wrong. No wonder they don't understand how planets form, and do not have any working model of planet formation!
What is more troubling is how deep they live in Plato's Cave. They also say, "and yet there still isn't a model anywhere in science that can explain exactly how planets form."
It is completely false. The theory already exists. It is called stellar metamorphosis.
Article here: https://phys.org/news/2017-10-scientists-assumptions-planet-formation.html
They accept the assumption that planets are remnants of star-formation. There is no proof that planets are remnants of star-formation. So, I find it strange that the headline to the article states,
Scientists question assumptions about planet formation
"Senior Lecturer in Astronomy at the School of Physical Sciences, Dr. Helen Fraser, says, "We are already aware of thousands of planets orbiting stars in our own galaxy, as remnants of star-formation, and yet there still isn't a model anywhere in science that can explain exactly how planets form. Our basic understanding is that small particles stick together, building bigger particles, which then also stick, and so forth, until eventually, we have a planet."
The assumption they refuse to question is, "are planets remnants of star-formation"? The answer is NO!
Planets are stellar remnants! They are the remnants of stellar evolution, in effect, they are the highly evolved stars!
All the evidence (future, past and current) points to stars in all stages of evolution into life hosting planets, which eventually die and wander the galaxy. Calling the evolving stars, "planets" is where they are wrong. So totally wrong. No wonder they don't understand how planets form, and do not have any working model of planet formation!
What is more troubling is how deep they live in Plato's Cave. They also say, "and yet there still isn't a model anywhere in science that can explain exactly how planets form."
It is completely false. The theory already exists. It is called stellar metamorphosis.
Tuesday, April 30, 2019
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)