Friday, May 1, 2015

Am I a "Crank"?

Who knows. All I know is that I just remembered to overview an incompleteness regarding Bowen's Reaction Series/Goldich Dissolution Series:

The Goldich dissolution series is a way of predicting the relative stability or weathering rate of various minerals on the Earth's surface.

When this was invented, they did not know the surface was much different during gas giant phases of the Earth's evolution. It was under much higher pressure, the chemicals were different, and the very act of weathering was much, much more reliant on hydraulics rather than low pressure/oxidative properties of rain water coupled with mild acid.

I have so much work to do.


  1. you're no crank, in fact you're more correct than establishment anytime give or take but not 100% correct.
    read this:
    it may vastly improve your understanding about planets like earth. :)

    1. I guess after all this time I can see the two main philosophies which separate stellar metamorphosis from establishment:

      1. Establishment has planets as by products of star formation.

      2. Stellar metamorphosis has planets as the end result of star evolution.


Helpful comments will be appreciated, but if the user does not want to address the issues being presented they will be ignored. This is a blog dedicated to trying to explain how to make sense of the discovery that planet formation is star evolution itself, not a blog for false mainstream beliefs.