Dear Astrophysical Journal

Your content is irrelevant and inconsequential to the progress of science. It is suggested you pay attention to the fact that the internet exists.

Yours truly,


-Jeffrey Joseph Wolynski

The String Theorists (fake scientists) are Getting Dirty Dirty...

http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=8256

Authority and Tradition in Astrophysics/Geophysics

Mercury is a dead star, Earth is well on its way (still cooling off), Stellar Metamorphosis

http://www.skyandtelescope.com/astronomy-news/messenger-gets-to-work/

Rex was on the right track back in 2011... check out the comments section.

Who is Rex? Who knows. What's the use of posting online if people don't know who you are?

If Rex sees this it could help him/her out a little:

http://vixra.org/pdf/1601.0244v1.pdf

Principles of Stellar Metamorphosis

I think it would be best to establish some basic principles to 21st century star science. I have three at the very top of this page:

http://vixra.org/author/jeffrey_joseph_wolynski

I hope one day astronomers/astrophysicists/geologists/chemists/physicists/biologists in general see that all of their studies are interrelated and connected. We live in one NATURE. I do not understand why they have separated the interconnected sciences. I guess I have been honored by nature herself to talk about such understanding. I hope my readers can see what I see. If they don't I wish for them to talk to me and ask questions.

Here is the life/physical science principle paper:

http://vixra.org/abs/1601.0130

"Rings of a Super Saturn" as Published in Scientific American Vs. Stellar Metamorphosis

http://vixra.org/abs/1601.0041

Scientific American only accepts the current dogma. That's too bad. They'd have a richer understanding of nature if they ignored the dogmatists.

The Nice Model Versus Stellar Metamorphosis

http://vixra.org/abs/1512.0492

Another one bites the dust.