Thursday, March 30, 2017
Thursday, March 23, 2017
List of Topics Characterized as Pseudoscience was Archived... lol
http://archive.is/KYNfc
Check out the red one that does not link to a page... its under Earth Sciences...lmao. This is great. With 538 watchers on that page you'd think it would be deleted already.
Check out the red one that does not link to a page... its under Earth Sciences...lmao. This is great. With 538 watchers on that page you'd think it would be deleted already.
Wednesday, March 22, 2017
Some Chinese by Google, 恒星进化
科学错了。天文学的问题是他们认为星星和行星是相互排斥的。他们不是。一颗星星实际上是一个热的年轻的星球,一颗星球是一个古老的非常冷的星星,它已经失去了它的大部分。
Saturday, March 18, 2017
Stellar Metamorphosis on Wikipedia!
http://archive.is/i91Yj
Here is the archived page because it will be deleted by the dogmatists and wiki trolls. Anyways... It is fun doing this.
http://archive.is/XTQAw
This one is pretty cool. Good thing I found it.
Here is the archived page because it will be deleted by the dogmatists and wiki trolls. Anyways... It is fun doing this.
http://archive.is/XTQAw
This one is pretty cool. Good thing I found it.
Friday, March 17, 2017
An Exoplanet is an evolved star, Stellar Metamorphosis, The Stability Principle of Planet Formation
Just posting this because it does not exist in a google search. Oh, and here is a new paper called, "The Stability Principle of Planet Formation".
http://vixra.org/pdf/1703.0148v1.pdf
http://vixra.org/pdf/1703.0148v1.pdf
Abstract: Flare
stars signal the transition of red dwarfs to brown dwarfs in stellar
metamorphosis. This means brown dwarfs are not “failed stars”, just the next
stage after red dwarf. Reasoning is provided.
In stellar metamorphosis, exoplanets
are evolved/evolving stars. Since they are the same objects, they have the same
evolutionary timeline. Since they have the same evolutionary timeline, their
evolutionary paths can be inferred by their physical appearance. In this
specific case, it can be inferred that since brown dwarfs are cooler and
smaller than red dwarfs, then they were at one time actual red dwarfs, not
failed stars. This means they are not only vastly older than what mainstream
dogma accepts (sometimes as young as 23 million years old), but that their
transition from their hotter star stages is even signaled by the stage known as
“flare star”. This is the stage with which the main polar magnetic field of the
star overcomes the fields of the surface activity. This in turn is caused by
the iron/nickel core beginning formation and aligning the star’s magnetic field
internally. The electromagnetic turbulence of this process is what causes the
flares. Since the flares are extremely powerful, the star loses mass much more
rapidly than previous stages of stellar evolution. If any scientist wants to
figure out if the star is past flare stages or not, all they have to do is
figure out if it has a strong polar magnetic field. If it does, then flare
stages have past. If it has turbulent magnetic activity and is in the
temperature range of red dwarfs, then it has not and the scientist will
probably see flaring events if they pay attention to the star.
The transition of red dwarf to brown
dwarf in stellar evolution is signaled by flare star stage. This means brown
dwarfs are not failed stars, they are older stars than red dwarfs. Since red
dwarfs are already many hundreds of millions of years old, then all brown
dwarfs are also many hundreds of millions of years old. They are intermediate
aged stars according to stellar metamorphosis, not failed ones.
Monday, March 13, 2017
Saturday, March 11, 2017
Thursday, March 9, 2017
Tuesday, March 7, 2017
Wednesday, March 1, 2017
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)