Stellar Metamorphosis plus Expanding Earth vs. Plate Tectonics

 

Category	Plate Tectonics (Mainstream)	Stellar Metamorphosis + Expanding Earth (Integrated Model)
Origin of Earth	Formed from rocky debris in a solar nebula; grew by accretion	Earth is the remains of a former star (or gas giant), having lost most of its mass
Mechanism for Crustal Movement	Driven by mantle convection and lithospheric motion	Driven by decompression and expansion due to loss of massive stellar atmosphere
Cause of Ocean Basins	Formed by divergence at mid-ocean ridges and plate movement	Formed as the Earth’s solid regions expanded, cracking the crust and exposing deep interior
Source of Geological Activity	Subduction, rifting, volcanism due to internal heat and convection	Stress fractures and outgassing during decompression after atmospheric loss
Atmosphere Origin	Volcanic outgassing from rock	Residual primordial gas from early stellar atmosphere; not outgassed, but retained
Fit of Continents	Continental drift over a fixed-radius Earth	Continents were once connected on a smaller solid core that expanded with decompression
Problem of Subduction	Requires continuous recycling of crust via subduction zones	Subduction is reinterpreted as gravitational settling of older crustal slabs—not true recycling
Energy Source	Internal radioactive decay and thermal convection	Gravitational potential energy released from decompression (as outer layers expand outward)

Stellar Metamorphosis Plus Expanding Earth vs. Mainstream

 

Anomaly / Problem	Mainstream Struggle	SM+EE Interpretation
Lack of oceanic crust older than ~200 million years	Explained via subduction, but evidence of vast, deep subducted slabs is indirect or controversial	Oceans didn’t exist until Earth began expanding; crust is new because it's literally new surface exposed during decompression
Fit of continents on a smaller globe	Often called coincidence; explained via continental drift but requires reconstruction	It's literal: Earth’s solid core was smaller under pressure, then expanded — this is physical expansion, not drift
No direct evidence for mantle convection	Convection is assumed to drive plates but is unobservable at the required scales	Not needed; decompression explains crustal stress, faulting, and volcanism more simply
Distribution of mountain ranges	Must be explained by specific collision events and plate boundaries	Caused by stress redistribution during volume increase (like a balloon wrinkling)
Isostasy and crustal uplift anomalies	Some regions are rising unexpectedly	Decompression causes broad uplift, not just local isostatic balance
Deep-focus earthquakes (below 300 km)	Should not occur in brittle rock at such depths	Explained as settling and cracking of older, previously compressed interior layers

Stellar Metamorphosis is Far More Holistic than the Nebular Hypothesis

 

1. Thermodynamic Holism

 

Instead of treating thermodynamics as background math, SM makes it the core driver of cosmic transformation:

 

    Stars evolve thermodynamically into planets.

 

    Planetary layers, atmospheres, and life emerge via energy dissipation over time.

 

    Temperature, pressure, and entropy guide structure, not just support it.

 

This contrasts with conventional models where energy equations are static and secondary to mechanics or kinematics.

🧭 2. Directional Time Holism

 

SM emphasizes directional, irreversible evolution:

 

    Not cyclic or eternal-return cosmology.

 

    The universe unfolds in one direction: from hot to cool, from luminous to quiet, from plasma to organism.

 

This reflects a deep temporal coherence between astrophysics, geology, and biology.

🧬 3. Chemical Continuity Holism

 

In SM:

 

    The chemistry of stars becomes the chemistry of life.

 

    Elements are not just ejected or accreted randomly; they're sorted, layered, and reactive as the object cools.

 

    Organic chemistry is an expected outcome, not a fluke.

 

This perspective bridges cosmochemistry with biochemistry, naturally.

🌍 4. Layered Structural Holism

 

SM treats a star/planet as an integrated body:

 

    Core, mantle, crust, magnetosphere, atmosphere, and biosphere are not separate systems but phases of the same entity.

 

    These layers record the star’s previous states like a biological organism stores memory.

 

This is a radically different view from how science separates “space science,” “solid Earth science,” and “life sciences.”

🌱 5. Emergent Complexity Holism

 

Rather than assuming complexity is assembled through random external events (like asteroid impacts or late veneer theory), SM holds that:

 

    Complexity emerges from within as the object cools.

 

    Self-organization replaces external accidents as the main creative force.

 

    Stars are pre-programmed to become complex, in the same way embryos are.

 

This adds a developmental logic to planetary formation — not just an aggregative one.

🔄 6. Recycling and Reuse Holism

 

SM implies:

 

    All planets were stars, and all stars will become planets.

 

    This loops cosmic material through a grand metamorphic cycle.

 

    There is no absolute death — only phase transition.

 

This view is deeply ecological, mirroring natural cycles seen in ecosystems and biology.

🔗 7. Causal Holism (Not Just Correlation)

 

SM links cause and effect across scales:

 

    Planetary magnetism is a remnant of stellar plasma dynamics.

 

    Tectonics arise from contracting, differentiating interiors of cooling stars.

 

    Life isn’t just “present” on Earth — it is a predictable outcome of stellar aging.

 

This reclaims meaning and causality from probabilistic models that dominate mainstream narratives.

🧘 8. Epistemological Holism

 

SM challenges not only data interpretations, but the structure of knowledge itself:

 

    It opposes the idea of specialist silos.

 

    It promotes cross-field synthesis: astronomy, geology, thermodynamics, biology, and philosophy in one narrative.

 

    It’s not just a physical model — it’s a new way of seeing.

Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons, Wiki whatever, Stellar Metamorphosis Diagram

Anhydrous Conditions are Needed for Origin of Life, Stellar Metamorphosis

 Water will ruin the chemistry needed for the origin of life. Anhydrous conditions are in evolving stars such as the many thousand count "exoplanets" in the current observational inventory. Anhydrous conditions are also in our own solar system, in Jupiter, Saturn, Neptune and Uranus, which are intermediate aged stars. They are forming pre-biotic material right now, in real time. 

https://www.tutorchase.com/answers/ib/chemistry/why-do-some-organic-reactions-need-anhydrous-conditions

How much energy does it take to form life from scratch, origin of life, stellar metamorphosis

Link here in case google takes this down:

https://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Essays/View/10112 

https://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Essays-Ecology%20-%20Life/Social%20Sciences/Download/10112

 

To Celeste

Love, Jeffrey

 

According to the General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis, life is a direct by-product of star evolution. This means that all the gravitational potential energy of a very young star can be (is) used to provide the energy for creating life from scratch. All we have to do is calculate the total GPE of a star to completely disintegrate and give an estimate of how much energy is needed. This number is its gravitational binding energy, which for the Sun is 2.2 * 10^41 Joules.

 

 

            The vast amount of energy needed to create life from scratch is mostly waste/exhaust energy. The creation of life is probably the most energy inefficient process in the universe. As a star gravitationally collapses, the gravitational potential energy of the star is transformed into friction, heat, electrical, chemical, etc. energy. This is called energy transformation and is essential to taking the total energy of a collapsing star, and converting it into more and more complex chemical/biological products. Unfortunately, (or fortunately), since the 2^nd law of thermodynamics requires there to be an enormous heat sink for the vast amount of extra entropy produced, it becomes necessary to remove the majority of the star’s power in a manner consistent with the production of the chemicals and biological processes involved in life formation from scratch.

            In other words, the fact that the stars shine is direct observational evidence that the chemicals required to form life from scratch are being produced. Complexity of the chemicals is increasing as the extra/unneeded enthalpy is removed. The entropic cost of life formation is paid by the star shining and flaring. The origin of life is a direct result of a star going though its evolution into a smaller, less mass, cooler star, and transitioning into a more solid structure with a tame, mostly life hosting capacity, from a not so tame, violent and toxic past.

            Keep this in mind when you observe objects like Jupiter/Neptune or the Sun. They are toxic, violent and way too hot now, this does not mean the precursors to life and the origins of life are not in full swing. Instead of classifying stars, we should understand that they are metamorphic in nature, all the way to Mercury sized, rocky, metal cored balls, with no magnetic field, and everything in between. The mass of stars is lost as they gravitationally collapse, all the observations show us this, this means that gravitational potential energy is essentially to the creation of life from scratch.

Expanding Earth Mechanism

 

The expanding earth theory is the idea that the earth was significantly smaller 200 million years ago, and at that time the land continents as we know them made up 100% of the earth's crust, and were also mostly covered by water. Then over time, the earth's surface expanded and split along the modern day fault lines, creating large rifts in the crust, and allowing the mantle exposed by this process to cool and become ocean floor. Meanwhile, the water on top of the original crust drained away to the new ocean crust, making the older crust dry land.

I believe this theory makes more intuitive sense and is better supported by evidence than the current geological model of continental drift propelled by oceanic spreading.

I don't think the lack of a known mechanism behind the phenomenon disproves the theory. There are other theories accepted in modern day thought (like the Big Bang Theory) that lack a known mechanism. 

 

(The mechanism is atmospheric release. The Earth decompressed from "gas giant" phases of evolution after it was finished forming in the interior of the star.)