Saturday, November 19, 2016
Wednesday, November 2, 2016
Wednesday, October 26, 2016
Short Narrative on learning new things, Stellar Metamorphosis
A
short recollection of an event which happened to me back in the late summer
2007. I was at Florida State University and I went to get the key to my post
office box because I was moving into the dorm at Kellum Hall. I remember
waiting in line to receive my key at the post office on campus, and it was about 5 P.M. I remember being
very curious about everything, always asking questions and what not, making new
friends, striking up conversations with anybody who had time to spare. Given
the majority were college aged there was a lot of time.
With only school and
partying as the priority it was really easy to make room for socialization.
That being said, I remember quite vividly asking this one guy, who was skinny
and tall like me what the book he was reading was about. I remember seeing that
it was some type of mathematical theory book, I want to say quantum mechanics
and the like, but I’m not too sure exactly. I naively asked him to sort of give
me a quick run down of what it was, and I was told it was really advanced and
that I wouldn’t understand. As he said that though, I got the feeling he had
been at it for a while, and his eyes sort of glazed over as it said it. Mind
you, he wasn’t being arrogant, it was just something to the tune of, “shit man,
I don’t get this stuff either.” I understood immediately that kind of brushing
away of questions. When someone tells me I wouldn’t understand it, I take it as
they don’t understand it themselves. Its sort of a way of elevating the
person’s ego in a conversational sense, so that they can appear to be
knowledgable. Case in point, if he really understood it he could have just
explained it in one sentence. Why say, “you wouldn’t understand”?
I just remember that and it sticks out in my mind. Its like, who am I now? I am Jeffrey Wolynski, a theory designer of alternative planet formation/ stellar evolution. A fringe theorist who doesn’t give a shit about being accepted. That was a full four years before the discovery was made. Seeing these young minds rack their brains for acceptance (yes, that’s what it is, nothing more nothing less) irks me. They should be trying to learn new things, and filter out the bullshit when it appears! Not accept it just because people who are teaching you this crap believe it!
I just remember that and it sticks out in my mind. Its like, who am I now? I am Jeffrey Wolynski, a theory designer of alternative planet formation/ stellar evolution. A fringe theorist who doesn’t give a shit about being accepted. That was a full four years before the discovery was made. Seeing these young minds rack their brains for acceptance (yes, that’s what it is, nothing more nothing less) irks me. They should be trying to learn new things, and filter out the bullshit when it appears! Not accept it just because people who are teaching you this crap believe it!
The Cooling Principle of Stellar Metamorphosis
http://vixra.org/abs/1610.0262
According to
stellar metamorphosis theory we can see stars that are very, very cold, only in
the tens of Kelvin in their high atmospheres. Since they were really hot in the
many tens of thousands of Kelvin when they were born, it is clear they have
cooled down significantly. Fortunately there is a simple mathematical/physical
relationship that can explain how this occurred. It is the 1st Law
of Thermodynamics. Since stars produce heat, and have no mechanism for
replacing the heat lost, they will cool. Therefore heat loss will continue
indefinitely on all stars that shine and are not heated on their exteriors
similar to Hot Jupiters. Heat loss will also continue on stars that do not
shine strongly, as they are gravitationally collapsing, producing heat via
chemical reactions, tugging on other objects gravitationally, their magmas are
cooling, etc.
Monday, October 17, 2016
Exoplanets are Old Stars, Stellar Metamorphosis
Thought I'd just add another easy to understand statement in there for the google search engine. You never know how people are going to discover this as I have, might as well mix it up.
Thursday, October 13, 2016
In my spanish class I learned about how religious countries really are...
Okay, so it is this simple. Spanish politicians can choose what to swear on, either their Constitution or the Bible... In the U.S. el Presidente swears on the Bible only... or "the Book" really.
Then it all made sense to me.
Big Bang is so widely accepted in the U.S. BECAUSE we are so religious.
For those who don't know, the U.S. is VERY religious. Does the term Bible Belt have any significance? Its the red part in the map above.
Big Bang is fundamentalist creationism. This is why they are totally cool with it taking about a week or so...Just like in Genesis.
There is no WAY in hell we will ever get rid of it as a "scientific theory". It would be as difficult as getting rid of Christianity or Judaism or Islam. So essentially it has to be said. The real atheists of the world reject creationism, a.k.a. Big Bang.
Then it all made sense to me.
Big Bang is so widely accepted in the U.S. BECAUSE we are so religious.
For those who don't know, the U.S. is VERY religious. Does the term Bible Belt have any significance? Its the red part in the map above.
Big Bang is fundamentalist creationism. This is why they are totally cool with it taking about a week or so...Just like in Genesis.
There is no WAY in hell we will ever get rid of it as a "scientific theory". It would be as difficult as getting rid of Christianity or Judaism or Islam. So essentially it has to be said. The real atheists of the world reject creationism, a.k.a. Big Bang.
Monday, October 10, 2016
Stellar Evolution and Planet Formation are Mass Loss Phenomena, Stellar Metamorphosis
Here's the paper! https://vixra.org/pdf/1609.0424v1.pdf
Basically as a star loses mass it becomes the planet, meaning planets are formed because stars lose mass... or planet formation is a process that includes lots of mass loss...
Its pretty simple.
I guess its much different than establishment (they are wrong obviously) because they have stars as being static in terms of mass, and planets forming by accreting mass over long periods of time with very weak gravitational fields.
I'm sure my readers already know what their system of planet formation doesn't work. How exactly does something with very little gravitation form itself? It doesn't make any sense. To form something as massive as Jupiter or the Earth, you absolutely needed a GIANT gravitational field.
Not a tiny one.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
