http://vixra.org/pdf/1905.0411v1.pdf
Now it is time to go full blast. I'm getting the hang of what this data means,... I think...
yea dude. Plus there is a specific pattern I'm finding. The D/H ratios
are highest for top material (closer to Venus's ratio), and go lower the
deeper into the star you go (closer to the Sun's ratios).
This is important because it infers the material that formed the
earliest in the star's evolution will have combined into more complex
molecules such as acetylene, C2H2, and methane, CH4.
In other words, the ratio's should appear older near the top of the
star, and younger as you go deeper, the reverse of the geological
principle of superposition. This is because of the process of
differentiation, the youngest most pristine material will deposit
internally as it forms more complex molecules out of D and H
(acetylene/methane), and work its way outward as it is deposited.
link
Sure its an old paper, but it is good that I can cross over the absolute
age in a reverse manner, as opposed to the relative age as offered by
the principle of superposition (geological principle). [en.wikipedia.org]
No comments:
Post a Comment
Helpful comments will be appreciated, but if the user does not want to address the issues being presented they will be ignored. This is a blog dedicated to trying to explain how to make sense of the discovery that planet formation is star evolution itself, not a blog for false mainstream beliefs.