I made a big mistake in assuming electric universe proponents cared about science.
This means they will never discuss the discovery that Earth is the remains of an ancient star, and stellar evolution is the process of planet formation.
Never ever going to happen. Ever.
Hycean is a portmanteau of ocean and hydrogen.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hycean_planet
The astronomers just invented it back in August of this year.
Spoiler: They are worlds in intermediate stages of evolution between Neptune like worlds and Ocean worlds, as predicted to exist by stellar metamorphosis.
Book here: https://vixra.org/abs/1711.0206
Unidentified flying objects... they don't fly, doesn't fit.
Unidentified aerial phenomenon? Some were observed in the ocean and outer space, doesn't fit.
Unidentified aerial and transmedium craft? Sure.
They are unidentified, aerial, transmedium and... they are craft. Clearly.
https://cosmosmagazine.com/space/astronomy/did-venus-ever-have-oceans/
More mainstream uggghhhhh concerning Venus never having had oceans.
Venus is ~450-750 billion years old.
Lets do the math here. How accurate are the weatherman's take on hurricanes? Spaghetti models anybody?
Yet they know the entire past history of a dead star based on current conditions? Come on.
For those who what a more comprehensive understanding of stars, watch this video:
Funny. A google search doesn't turn up facts like that. It takes hundreds of millions of years to form an exoplanet.
All exoplanets are old.
It took the Earth 4.5 billion years to form.
https://vixra.org/abs/1711.0206
Stars are evolving planets. Book here: https://vixra.org/pdf/1711.0206v5.pdf
Planets are evolving stars. Book here: https://vixra.org/pdf/1711.0206v5.pdf
Hi!
Listen, many of us here know you can speak English and can see what we are doing here. We know you are visiting and hanging out in the oceans and what not.
How about doing some flyovers of populated areas again like over Phoenix back in 1997. Hang low, make sure visibility is high, make SURE people have their cameras out and are taking video and pictures. I know your craft have the ability to monitor far more than just heat signatures.
So, go ahead. Let er rip!
https://www.gofundme.com/f/ufos-and-nukes-press-conference-2021
Here is the link above. I'm not sure if it will happen, but a little money goes a long way. It is time for disclosure.
They can't move an inch with regards to exoplanet interpretation without first bending the knee.
The only people really freaked out about it are politicians and high ranking military.
Regular people are thrilled to know the truth! We are not alone!
Reddit post on stellar metamorphosis in unregulatedcomplaints
https://www.reddit.com/r/UnregulatedComplaints/comments/ovhu0b/wrote_a_book_on_stellar_evolution_planet/
"The Story of Stellar Metamorphosis" - A talk based on, and analysis of, pseudoscience (Warwick, June 2019).
I wonder what was in this talk.
I don't think Jack has been in science for the past 10 years. I find it interesting over the years that people who have issues with SM are preoccupied with defining what they think "pseudoscience" is.
I think their preoccupation with defining pseudoscience is simply admission via projection. In other words, what they claim others are doing, is EXACTLY what they are doing.
Fact: No scientist has EVER seen a star evolve. Yet, they drew up entire models of stellar evolution, without the corresponding observations to support their models. Now that the observations of intergalactic objects are rolling in via exoplanet data, it is becoming more glaring that people like Jack have NEVER understood what they were talking about.
The highly evolved, evolving and dead stars are called "exoplanets/planets". Planets and stars were NEVER mutually exclusive.
Pseudoscientists don't actually exist. There are people who do not fully understand what they are talking about but are trying their best, Jack in this case, and people like me who pointed out that people like Jack don't understand the basics of stellar evolution or planet formation (same thing). You can claim to be educated, but that education only goes in line with social groups.
Real, genuine understanding is not tied to social order, it is just genuine understanding.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lexical_semantics
It is a mix of cultural and lexical semantics.
It is not a question of science at the heart of the issue, it is a question of cultural beliefs.
Professor Tom Marsh,
Planet formation is stellar evolution. It is explained by the General Theory of Stellar Metamorphosis. Conceptual separation has led to confusion for two thousand years plus (ongoing, as is outlined by issues with defining exoplanet/planet). The Ancient Greeks have done a major disservice by labeling extremely old and dead stars and stellar remains as “wandering stars”, a.k.a. “planets/moons”, but now “exoplanets/exomoons”.
It is a similar issue with geocentrism vs heliocentrism. Only this issue was even older and is still not fully vetted by mainstream academia. I am only ridiculed and told I am a “pseudoscientist” by colleagues of yours.
One should wonder, how is someone a “fake scientist” if they raise a very important and mostly unexplored scientific issue? As well, if I am right, what does that make people who reject what I have discovered?
Sincerely,
Jeffrey Wolynski
It is intuitive to me that people from other star systems are visiting us, and have been around our world for tens of thousands of years. We have a lot of catching up to do now.
It has 1.1 + million views. I'm sure a lot of those are bots, but it is telling how much effort was put into the thread. https://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewforum.php?f=10https://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewforum.php?f=10
I have let them know of this discovery, so far they are in denial just as much as mainstream is. There is no such thing as "planet". They are all stars/stellar remains.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/01/210121151003.htm
Solar system formation in two easy steps! Really? Their bias is showing. Nothing about the solar system is easy, not only that, but institutions across the board are totally clueless as to WHAT they are looking at. Stars are young planets. So, two easy steps? No.
Planet formation is the most complex process in the universe because it includes the creation of life itself. Easy steps? These guys are smoking something.
A USP, or ultra short period planet, is a evolving star that exchanged orbits with another object, meaning the angular momentum was exchanged. This rearrangement is natural and predicted to occur with stars of all sizes and ages.
The nebular hypothesis did not predict this. The astronomers are clueless. They have no idea how objects as massive as 70 Jupiter masses can exist that close to a much younger host star.
The case as it stands is simple really. Young hot stars are not billions of years old. This is why they can adopt much older ones that haven't had their thick atmospheres ripped away. There just simply has not been enough time.
Book here: https://vixra.org/pdf/1711.0206v5.pdf
There is no word for the opposite of loneliness?
Okay, language is all made up. Lets make one up.
Famoness.
That means the opposite of loneliness.
It is pronounced "fa-mo-ness".
We're done.
I want to feel famoness.
It is a mix of familiar/family/famous. It means to feel loved and appreciated unconditionally, mixed with the feeling of having had eaten a large meal, but not overstuffing yourself.
https://vixra.org/abs/1303.0157
Wow. Old book has 4,502 unique i.p. downloads now. No wonder the exoplanet people are awfully silent these days.
They all realize planets (exoplanets) are just old stars. Hush hush people, hush hush. Don't talk about the elephant in the room.
The planets are evolutionary in nature. They do not form "as is".
The Earth evolved to this point, and the evidence is overwhelming in many thousands of objects that will become Earth-like discovered by TESS and Kepler.
Here is the book: https://vixra.org/pdf/1711.0206v5.pdf
