Clear Communication is not Appreciated

http://www.bigear.org/CSMO/HTML/CS08/cs08p08.htm

http://www.bigear.org/CSMO/HTML/CS08/cs08p08.htm

Clearly communicating yourself in a scientific setting is not appreciated.

Something I kinda knew. Complexity is viewed as being more valuable, why? It keeps people's minds spinning I guess? They have patterns of thought that are full of mumbo jumbo and getting rid of it would throw a wrench in the works? I don't know.

I do know that by clearly communicating my own theory of star evolution, I will not be considered as a serious philosopher/scientist. Maybe I should muck up the papers with verbiage and include a bunch of meaningless math equations. Then people will take me seriously?

Hubble's Opinion on the "Big Bang"

"Meanwhile, on the basis of the evidence now available, apparent discrepancies between theory and observation must be recognized.  A choice is presented, as once before in the days of Copernicus, between a strangely small, finite universe and a sensibly infinite universe plus a new principle of nature."


https://sites.google.com/site/bigbangcosmythology/home/edwinhubble/ 

So, the big bang believers think the universe is strangely small and finite:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_bang

And people with common sense believe in the more sensible infinite universe, plus a new principle of nature, as did Halton Arp:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halton_Arp

His paper:

http://www.haltonarp.com/articles/intrinsic_redshifts_in_quasars_and_galaxies.pdf

Special Relativity and General Relativity

I wanted to only write about this stuff extensively only AFTER I understood them.

Long story short, I understand special relativity, all it means is that the speed of light is independent of the source. That's it. We're done. Thousands of papers written on it. Only one sentence needed to fully understand it. It doesn't take years of schooling.

I do not understand general relativity. Or the theory that gravity is a geometric. Only one problem: geometry is measurement. You can measure things all day, all night, it does not mean it explains anything.

So in conclusion:

Special relativity means there is no giant universal clock as everything is relative to its frame of reference (meaning the big bang is nonsense).

General relativity is measurement of gravitation and does not explain its causes. Thus it is not a theory of gravitation but a theory of measuring gravitation. Big difference.

Einstein got ahead of himself. His 1905 paper Special Relativity was awesome and incredibly important. His 1915 paper general relativity has no practical significance to reality. His stature though has lead people down the path of pseudoscience.

Its strange, discover great understanding and then all of a sudden none of your other writings get questioned. I will have to watch out for that.

More Creationists Spewing Dogma and Nonsense

Here are all the papers on BICEP2: http://bicepkeck.org/#papers

Here is my take:

What did they discover? Gravitational waves from the Big Bang?

Wow. I hope they get the Nobel Prize for that. It explains absolutely nothing of significance. Society will move on after this as if it never happened. Let those old guys award themselves prizes and money. In the future we will look back on this and laugh at our own folly. The universe having a creation moment?

If anybody wants my take on the universe it is this:

The universe is eternal, it had no beginning and will have no end. It was never created.

Sure, stars can be born and die, galaxies can be born and die, large scale structures and come into being and then fade away like clouds on a windy day, but the universe as a whole? Shit, that's everything! All that is seen and unseen! Notice the key word: Unseen. So, to have a creation of what you don't even know is there? The epitome of ignorant rambling.

Let the creationists have their last huzzah. Their time is over. They have kept humanity in the dark long enough, but not will award themselves their prizes because of... well, because of political strings being pulled to maintain the smoke and mirrors of Big Bang Creationism. I wonder how much money the Vatican is wiring to the Nobel Committee to keep up the charades?

Establishment and their House of Cards

For the reader it should be made pretty obvious:

If the nebular hypothesis is replaced then their house of cards falls.

1. Nebular hypothesis goes, so does their theory of planet formation from gravity alone go.

2. When gravity isn't the dominate force that creates planets... we then have a serious problem. It means there is another type of force that is more important.

3. Establishment scientists heads and careers:

We first simply needed to replace the nebular hypothesis. Stellar metamorphosis does this:

Stellar Metamorphosis

Stellar Metamorphosis versus Establishment Dogma: The Location of Accretion

http://vixra.org/pdf/1403.0312v1.pdf
Link to Above paper

Establishment dogma and stellar metamorphosis are very different understandings.

The dogma has planets forming out of vacuum, absent a heat source, a gravitating body, etc.

Stellar metamorphosis has planets forming inside of stars as a star is a new planet. One star makes one planet. It is basic star science. The problem is that humans have the two words "planet" and "star" as being mutually exclusive objects because of their nearsightedness of the past recent years.

I would guess about 1992 was the pivotal year in which we realized there are smaller objects floating about in the galaxy similar to Earth. Since most scientists possess no imagination though, there was no way to get alternative theories published. Now that the cat is out of the bag and we have been finding many tens of thousands of stars that are Earth sized, we can come to the more reasonable conclusion that a "planet" is nothing but an evolved star.

We therefore have come full circle. From thinking stars and planets were mutually exclusive, to realizing they are the same objects only in different stages to their evolution. No crazy delusional math is required for the greatest of understandings.

People who realize what I do can monopolize on this information, as it is superior to the Big Bang Creationism and Nebular Hypothesis that gets taught in government sponsored institutions. Basically we can build a theory that makes both Big Bang Creationism and the Nebular Hypothesis obsolete, we don't even have to argue against them anymore. Arguing against them is a waste of time now, they are worthless theories that will bury themselves, like dinosaur fossils.

Perseverance

Perseverance: steadfastness in doing something despite difficulty or delay in achieving success.