The quasi-religion of Big Bang Creationism has to go. Big Bang Creationism is absolutely ridiculous. Big Bang Creationism is pseudoscience, and aging the stars based off this mythology is even more atrocious. Stars are different ages. Some, in their very last stages of evolution are even cold, mostly solid worlds able to host life.
Friday, May 30, 2014
Ten Followers
I have ten people following this blog. This is good. I hope to let them know that establishment science does not understand the stars at all. They call the old, evolving stars "planets/exo-planets".
The quasi-religion of Big Bang Creationism has to go. Big Bang Creationism is absolutely ridiculous. Big Bang Creationism is pseudoscience, and aging the stars based off this mythology is even more atrocious. Stars are different ages. Some, in their very last stages of evolution are even cold, mostly solid worlds able to host life.
The quasi-religion of Big Bang Creationism has to go. Big Bang Creationism is absolutely ridiculous. Big Bang Creationism is pseudoscience, and aging the stars based off this mythology is even more atrocious. Stars are different ages. Some, in their very last stages of evolution are even cold, mostly solid worlds able to host life.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Helpful comments will be appreciated, but if the user does not want to address the issues being presented they will be ignored. This is a blog dedicated to trying to explain how to make sense of the discovery that planet formation is star evolution itself, not a blog for false mainstream beliefs.