Mr. Oparin takes the stance that the center of the Sun is a red hot liquid nucleus on page 18,[1] and this is where him and I differ greatly. The Sun as it stands is hollow. It is too young to have formed a core, as core development happens as the star evolves. The surface of young stars like the Sun signal the material is much too hot to even be liquid, but exists in its ionized state and becomes gaseous as it cools and the gas condenses into the central regions of the star forming the core. This inward falling material would case the star to shrink and cool, forming the core as it gravitationally collapses. Core development is an end result of a star's evolution, young stars do not have cores.
[1] www.valencia.edu/~orilife/textos/The%20Origin%20of%20Life.pdf
Edit: I no longer think the center of the Sun is hollow, i.e. vacuum. I revise the statement to state that there is no fully developed core. The Sun is homogeneous, meaning no chemical differentiation by depth. There is pressure differentiation by depth obviously, but this is subject to change as the Sun evolves into an orange dwarf star, and then a red dwarf. -JJW 5/16/2025
No comments:
Post a Comment
Helpful comments will be appreciated, but if the user does not want to address the issues being presented they will be ignored. This is a blog dedicated to trying to explain how to make sense of the discovery that planet formation is star evolution itself, not a blog for false mainstream beliefs.