dwarf
|
K
|
Rsun
|
Msun
|
Lsun
|
Mag
|
AU
|
hr
|
hr
|
%
|
M0
|
3800
|
0.62
|
0.60
|
7.2
|
9.34
|
0.268
|
1571
|
5.37
|
0.022
|
M1
|
3600
|
0.49
|
0.49
|
3.5
|
9.65
|
0.190
|
1039
|
3.96
|
0.035
|
M2
|
3400
|
0.44
|
0.44
|
2.3
|
10.12
|
0.152
|
786
|
3.36
|
0.043
|
M3
|
3250
|
0.39
|
0.36
|
1.5
|
11.15
|
0.123
|
633
|
2.96
|
0.055
|
M4
|
3100
|
0.262
|
0.20
|
0.55
|
12.13
|
0.075
|
401
|
2.06
|
0.124
|
M5
|
2800
|
0.20
|
0.14
|
0.22
|
16.0
|
0.047
|
238
|
1.50
|
0.209
|
M6
|
2600
|
0.15
|
0.10
|
0.09
|
16.6
|
0.030
|
147
|
1.07
|
0.372
|
M7
|
2500
|
0.12
|
~0.09
|
0.05
|
18.8
|
0.022
|
98
|
0.78
|
0.582
|
M8
|
2400
|
0.11
|
~0.08
|
0.03
|
19.8
|
0.019
|
81
|
0.69
|
0.69
|
M9
|
2300
|
0.08
|
~0.075
|
0.015
|
17.4
|
0.013
|
46
|
0.43
|
1.31
|
If you'll notice, the temperature of M0 to M9 drops 1500 Kelvin. The radius diminishes close to a factor of 10, and the luminosity almost falls off the chart. .015 the luminosity of the Sun for M9 red dwarfs.
Why not just keep on going to M10, M11, M12, M13, M14 based on temperature measurements? No need. They have temperature measurements encompassing brown dwarfs between 2200 and 750K.
This means for red dwarfs the temp field is ~1500 K, and for brown dwarfs it is 1450K. An almost full 3000K drop in temperature as the stars evolve from being visible and over half the size of the Sun, to not having a visible spectrum.
The star begins disappearing in these two classifications, red and brown dwarf stages of evolution. That's pretty cool and of course, not mentioned in the accepted literature. The accepted literature has stars as keeping their mass as the evolve, yet clearly we see that isn't the case. As they cool and die they shrink and lose mass, meaning any evolutionary models which rely on mass determining what happens to the star are not only incomplete, but misguided.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Helpful comments will be appreciated, but if the user does not want to address the issues being presented they will be ignored. This is a blog dedicated to trying to explain how to make sense of the discovery that planet formation is star evolution itself, not a blog for false mainstream beliefs.