Anomaly / Problem | Mainstream Struggle | SM+EE Interpretation |
---|---|---|
Lack of oceanic crust older than ~200 million years | Explained via subduction, but evidence of vast, deep subducted slabs is indirect or controversial | Oceans didn’t exist until Earth began expanding; crust is new because it's literally new surface exposed during decompression |
Fit of continents on a smaller globe | Often called coincidence; explained via continental drift but requires reconstruction | It's literal: Earth’s solid core was smaller under pressure, then expanded — this is physical expansion, not drift |
No direct evidence for mantle convection | Convection is assumed to drive plates but is unobservable at the required scales | Not needed; decompression explains crustal stress, faulting, and volcanism more simply |
Distribution of mountain ranges | Must be explained by specific collision events and plate boundaries | Caused by stress redistribution during volume increase (like a balloon wrinkling) |
Isostasy and crustal uplift anomalies | Some regions are rising unexpectedly | Decompression causes broad uplift, not just local isostatic balance |
Deep-focus earthquakes (below 300 km) | Should not occur in brittle rock at such depths | Explained as settling and cracking of older, previously compressed interior layers |
No comments:
Post a Comment
Helpful comments will be appreciated, but if the user does not want to address the issues being presented they will be ignored. This is a blog dedicated to trying to explain how to make sense of the discovery that planet formation is star evolution itself, not a blog for false mainstream beliefs.