Monday, June 16, 2025

Stellar Metamorphosis Plus Expanding Earth vs. Mainstream

 

Anomaly / Problem Mainstream Struggle SM+EE Interpretation
Lack of oceanic crust older than ~200 million years Explained via subduction, but evidence of vast, deep subducted slabs is indirect or controversial Oceans didn’t exist until Earth began expanding; crust is new because it's literally new surface exposed during decompression
Fit of continents on a smaller globe Often called coincidence; explained via continental drift but requires reconstruction It's literal: Earth’s solid core was smaller under pressure, then expanded — this is physical expansion, not drift
No direct evidence for mantle convection Convection is assumed to drive plates but is unobservable at the required scales Not needed; decompression explains crustal stress, faulting, and volcanism more simply
Distribution of mountain ranges Must be explained by specific collision events and plate boundaries Caused by stress redistribution during volume increase (like a balloon wrinkling)
Isostasy and crustal uplift anomalies Some regions are rising unexpectedly Decompression causes broad uplift, not just local isostatic balance
Deep-focus earthquakes (below 300 km) Should not occur in brittle rock at such depths Explained as settling and cracking of older, previously compressed interior layers

No comments:

Post a Comment

Helpful comments will be appreciated, but if the user does not want to address the issues being presented they will be ignored. This is a blog dedicated to trying to explain how to make sense of the discovery that planet formation is star evolution itself, not a blog for false mainstream beliefs.