http://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.edu/
Kepler has 1904 confirmed planets and 4696 candidates.
Unfortunately for the Kepler scientists they don't understand how planets are formed. This is because they assume a "star" is something mutually exclusive of "planet". They are not. They are both "astrons" http://vixra.org/author/michal_zajaczkowski
A star is a young astron, a planet is an old astron.
This means the actual count is more than double the number of stars found with measured light curves. As each star is statistically hosting one "planet". http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-01/new-exoplanet-analysis-determines-planets-are-more-common-stars-milky-way
2 * 21,665,058 = 43,330,116 planets found
They are experts in finding them, no doubt. When it comes to explaining them however, they are idiots. They have over 43 million new/old Earths found. Will they realize it? Probably not.
Monday, November 9, 2015
Thursday, November 5, 2015
Plate Tectonics was always just a guess...What about Venus?
It does not apply to all evolved astrons (planets). How does a theory of land formation and movement only apply to the Earth? It is because it was invented before the other celestial objects were imaged with accuracy. We can now see that plate tectonics does not apply to other celestial objects thus is now a falsified educated guess.
Do you see plates on Venus? I see a big disorganized mess. It is a big secret... Venus falsified the hypothesis of plate tectonics. Since it was already in the text books for so many years before the surface was imaged, they kept it. It is now taught as dogma and the professors at universities don't bat an eye. Mountains on Venus without moving plates! How dare Nature do as she pleases!
Not only that but if Venus is supposedly the same age as Earth, then where the hell are all the damn volcanoes? You mean it cooled vastly faster than Earth, yet they are roughly the same size? What about the magnetic field why is that completely gone?! It appears to me that the idiots running the astrophysics departments have their heads up their asses!
Do you see plates on Venus? I see a big disorganized mess. It is a big secret... Venus falsified the hypothesis of plate tectonics. Since it was already in the text books for so many years before the surface was imaged, they kept it. It is now taught as dogma and the professors at universities don't bat an eye. Mountains on Venus without moving plates! How dare Nature do as she pleases!
Not only that but if Venus is supposedly the same age as Earth, then where the hell are all the damn volcanoes? You mean it cooled vastly faster than Earth, yet they are roughly the same size? What about the magnetic field why is that completely gone?! It appears to me that the idiots running the astrophysics departments have their heads up their asses!
Wednesday, November 4, 2015
Most Earth-like worlds have yet to be born...
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/10/151020104849.htm
yea. right.
Little do they know that stars cool and die, becoming Earth-like worlds. Someone please shake these idiots out of their ivy league induced comas!
yea. right.
Little do they know that stars cool and die, becoming Earth-like worlds. Someone please shake these idiots out of their ivy league induced comas!
Mainstream Astrophysicists are Idiots
After 4 years of deliberate thought and experience I have come to the conclusion that mainstream astrophysicists are idiots.
How can they be so dumb? A bunch of dolts! Its absolutely shocking, even Mr. Bean is appalled!
How can they be so dumb? A bunch of dolts! Its absolutely shocking, even Mr. Bean is appalled!
Tuesday, November 3, 2015
Amrinder Singh, Stellar Metamorphosis
Amrinder Singh has written a paper on Stellar Metamorphosis!
Good job!!!
http://vixra.org/abs/1511.0002
It already has 16 views! I wish to see more papers outlining more basic concepts concerning this theory in the future.
Good job!!!
http://vixra.org/abs/1511.0002
It already has 16 views! I wish to see more papers outlining more basic concepts concerning this theory in the future.
Monday, November 2, 2015
Stars are Chemical, Galaxies are Nuclear, Stellar Metamorphosis
Stars young and old, astrons, are chemically driven. This means that chemical reactions take place inside of stars as they evolve.
Nuclear processes drive the evolution of galaxies, as well as their birthing.
Stars : electrochemistry/thermochemistry :: galaxies : nuclear chemistry
Nuclear processes drive the evolution of galaxies, as well as their birthing.
Stars : electrochemistry/thermochemistry :: galaxies : nuclear chemistry
There Was No Discovery of Nuclear Fusion in Stars
O-, B-, and A-type stars are sometimes called "early type", whereas K and M stars are said to be "late type″. This stems from an early 20th-century model of stellar evolution in which stars were powered by gravitational contraction via the Kelvin–Helmholtz mechanism whereby stars start their lives as very hot "early-type" stars, and then gradually cool down, evolving into "late-type″ stars. This mechanism provided ages of the Sun that were much smaller than what is observed, and was rendered obsolete by the discovery that stars are powered by nuclear fusion.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellar_classification#Harvard_spectral_classification
No star is powered by nuclear fusion. You know why? Fusion is the arena of birthing galaxies. The stellar material was already synthesized in the galactic core and ejected outwards many billions of years ago. Not only that, but these objects weren't even known to science before the fusion model was invented. The experts simply placed fusion where it doesn't belong, inside of stars. It is one of the greatest mistakes ever in the history of science.
This is the actual location for fusion reactions, where the velocities are high enough to create heavy atomic nuclei from lighter nuclei:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellar_classification#Harvard_spectral_classification
No star is powered by nuclear fusion. You know why? Fusion is the arena of birthing galaxies. The stellar material was already synthesized in the galactic core and ejected outwards many billions of years ago. Not only that, but these objects weren't even known to science before the fusion model was invented. The experts simply placed fusion where it doesn't belong, inside of stars. It is one of the greatest mistakes ever in the history of science.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)