Yes.
Pseudoscience is a claim, belief or practice which is falsely presented as scientific, but does not adhere to a valid scientific method, lacks supporting scientific evidence or plausibility, cannot be reliably tested, or otherwise lacks scientific status. Pseudoscience is often characterized by the use of vague, contradictory, exaggerated or unprovable claims, an over-reliance on confirmation rather than rigorous attempts at refutation, a lack of openness to evaluation by other experts, and a general absence of systematic processes to rationally develop theories.
Spacetime warping is falsely presented as scientific and...
1. does not adhere to a valid scientific method
2. lacks supporting scientific evidence/plausibility
3. cannot be reliably tested
Spacetime warping uses...
1. vague
2. contradictory
3. exaggerated
4. unprovable claims
Spacetime warping is over-reliant on confirmation rather than rigorous attempts at refutation
Spacetime warping lacks openness to evaluation by other experts
Spacetime warping is absent a systematic process to rationally develop theories which can bolster it.
Einstein has destroyed humanities' attempt at actually understanding gravitation by introducing pseudoscience. Worst part about it all, the educated people do not realize it.
General Relativity is genuine pseudoscience.
If you are after the truth reader, there it is. Spacetime warping is fake science. Tell your friends.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Helpful comments will be appreciated, but if the user does not want to address the issues being presented they will be ignored. This is a blog dedicated to trying to explain how to make sense of the discovery that planet formation is star evolution itself, not a blog for false mainstream beliefs.