Yep.
Space is defined by the objects which give it definition. This means that space itself is non-existent but for the objects which define it.
Time is not a physical dimension. There are only 3 physical dimensions in reality.
Spacetime is a fake scientific concept. The idea that spacetime can warp is even more fictional. Why not spacetime heating up? Why not spacetime getting cold? Why not spacetime moving? Why not spacetime... on and on and on.
Spacetime is pseudoscience.
Let me be clear though, special relativity, meaning objects that we see in the night sky are not actually as we see them because there is a limit on the speed of light (but it is not a constant). Special relativity makes sense, but spacetime warping? Spacetime bending as an explanation of gravitation? Nope. It is nonsense. We can safely reject general relativity because it is worthless trash disguised as science.
So in short:
Special relativity describes the relationship between space and time. (science)
General relativity is a theory of gravitation by combining space with time, thus negating their actual meanings. (pseudoscience)
Friday, October 10, 2014
1 comment:
Helpful comments will be appreciated, but if the user does not want to address the issues being presented they will be ignored. This is a blog dedicated to trying to explain how to make sense of the discovery that planet formation is star evolution itself, not a blog for false mainstream beliefs.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Hi Jeffrey Wolynski. I certainly agree that general relativity is a pseudoscience. Special relativity is also a pseudoscience. Do you know of the work done by Wallace Kantor? His book, Relativistic Propagation of Light shows that the experimental evidence does not demonstrate special relativity. Mr. Phipps wrote a preface expressing his satisfaction that not only general but special relativity were refuted. His book is unavailable aside from Inter-library Loan in the U.S. but some of his articles are available.
ReplyDelete